Town of Antioch v. Williams Irrigation District
California Supreme Court
188 Cal. 451, 205 P. 688 (1922)
- Written by Curtis Parvin, JD
Facts
The Town of Antioch, California, had long-established appropriative rights to divert water from the Sacramento River for municipal uses. Later upstream appropriators drew more and more water from the river for beneficial use. While the upstream water diversion left enough flow for Antioch to draw, the reduced flow was not enough to prevent the upward migration of ocean saltwater from San Francisco Bay into the Sacramento Delta. Because the water was no longer potable at Antioch’s diversion point, Antioch could not use it. Antioch sued 27 defendants, including the Williams Irrigation District (the district) (defendant), relying on its senior water rights to demand that the court prohibit defendants from reducing the river’s flow to a point below what was necessary to keep the salt intrusion downstream from Antioch. The defendants contended that they had not polluted the river but simply diverted water for beneficial use. The superior court granted a temporary injunction in favor of Antioch. The district and the other defendants appealed to the California Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Shaw, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.