Town of Flower Mound v. Stafford Estates Limited Partnership
Texas Supreme Court
135 S.W.3d 620 (2004)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
Stafford Estates Limited Partnership (plaintiff) proposed to build a development bordered by a road on each side. Based on local law provisions requiring that subdivision developers improve abutting roads that do not meet specified standards, the Town of Flower Mound (defendant) approved Stafford’s development plans on the condition that Stafford completely rebuild one of the abutting roads with concrete instead of asphalt. Stafford objected to the condition, contending that the asphalt surface was in good repair, but ultimately rebuilt the road, spending $484,303.79. Thereafter, Stafford demanded reimbursement from the town. The town refused, and Stafford brought suit, arguing that the town’s actions in imposing the condition constituted an unconstitutional taking for which the town did not provide compensation under the applicable standards. The town contended that the development condition was not a taking because it advanced the legitimate government interests of traffic safety and road durability. The court found in Stafford’s favor, awarding damages. Both parties appealed. The court of appeals affirmed. The town again appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hecht, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.