Town of Monroe v. Renz

46 Conn. App. 5 (1997)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Town of Monroe v. Renz

Connecticut Appellate Court
46 Conn. App. 5 (1997)

Facts

In 1973, Ronald Renz (defendant) purchased a 133-acre tract of land in a residential area of the town of Monroe (the town) (plaintiff), where sand and gravel extractions had been ongoing since the 1940s. These extractions continued until 1987, at which point the demand for gravel was decreasing and the demand for crushed rock increasing. Renz had a rock crusher installed and commenced operations that required the use of explosives and constant drilling into rock formations. The town alleged violation of zoning ordinances and issued a cease-and-desist order. This led to proceedings before the zoning authorities and later the superior court, where the town sought injunctive relief. The court found in favor of the town and issued a permanent injunction against the site’s rock-crushing operations. Renz appealed. The town cross-appealed for additional injunctive relief, arguing that the court should have ordered the removal of the rock crusher.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Langenbach, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership