Town of Orangetown v. Magee
New York Court of Appeals
665 N.E.2d 1061 (1996)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
Bradley Industrial Park, owned by John and Patrick Magee (defendants), purchased land in the Town of Orangetown (plaintiff) in order to construct a $3-million industrial building. The town’s building inspector approved the building plans and issued a permit for the construction in 1980. After the Magees commenced preparation for construction, including the erection of a temporary structure for use during building, community members began to demonstrate strong opposition to the plans. As a result, the building inspector revoked the building permit. The town thereafter amended its zoning code to prohibit construction of any commercial buildings and brought suit against the Magees to force removal of the temporary structure that had already been built on the land. The Magees counterclaimed for reinstatement of the permit and for damages totaling more than $5 million, claiming that the town’s actions constituted an unconstitutional taking. The trial court found that the town’s motivation for revoking the permit was entirely political, and dismissed the complaint. The court entered judgment in favor of the Magees, concluding that they had spent more than $4 million on the construction project before the town revoked the permit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Simons, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.