Town of Warren v. Hazardous Waste Facility Site Safety Council
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
466 N.E.2d 102 (1984)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
In 1980, the Massachusetts legislature enacted the Hazardous Waste Facility Siting Act (siting act). The purpose of the siting act was to immediately encourage and expedite the development of hazardous-waste treatment and disposal facilities to protect the general welfare. The siting act provided communities that hosted such facilities with a significant role in the siting process. The purpose of providing host communities a larger role in the siting process was to decrease local resistance to the siting of such facilities. The siting act provided that a local-assessment committee was to be formed to oversee the siting process and participate in the selection of an agreeable site for hazardous waste. Before a facility could be constructed, a siting agreement between the developer and the host community was required. If no siting agreement could be reached, then the developer and the host community had to submit to final and binding arbitration. Once a siting agreement was established, the developer was eligible for a license if it could be established that the developer’s facility would pose no greater risk to the local community than the risk similar facilities located in other municipalities posed to their respective areas. Persons aggrieved by the final approval of a facility were permitted to appeal to the superior court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.