Towner v. State
Supreme Court of Wyoming
685 P.2d 45 (1984)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Charles Towner (defendant) was charged with four counts of concealing stolen goods. At the beginning of the trial, the trial court granted a motion to sequester the witnesses. Towner testified that his wife had purchased the goods in question. In addition, Towner planned to call as witnesses his father and sister (Towner’s witnesses), who planned to testify that Towner’s wife had told them that she had purchased the goods in question. However, Towner’s witnesses were seen in the courtroom and thus the trial court excluded from being called because they had violated the sequestration order. Subsequently, however, it was learned that Towner’s witnesses had been asked to enter the courtroom by an agent of the prosecution’s office. Towner brought this to the trial court’s attention, but the trial court affirmed its decision to exclude Towner’s witnesses. The trial court determined that Towner’s witnesses’ testimony was “of dubious relevance [and] also cumulative to what the defendant ha[d] already testified to, and which no one has challenged.” The trial court then convicted Towner. He appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cardine, J.)
Dissent (Rooney, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
