Township of Sparta v. Spillane
New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
312 A.2d 154 (1973)
- Written by Galina Abdel Aziz , JD
Facts
The Township of Sparta (plaintiff) and Mount Olive Township (plaintiff) operated under New Jersey’s Faulkner Act (the act), which gave residents the powers of referendums and initiatives. A referendum involved either the city council submitting an ordinance to voters for approval or rejection or a petition being filed for a vote on any ordinance enacted by the city council. An initiative involved voters proposing an ordinance and adopting or rejecting the ordinance at the polls. After Sparta amended its zoning ordinance to authorize planned unit development, Lawrence Spillane and others (defendants) filed a petition seeking a referendum on the ordinance pursuant to the act. The municipal clerk found the petition sufficient. Sparta then sought, and the trial court granted, a declaratory judgment that the act’s referendum provisions did not apply to amendments of zoning ordinances. In a separate case, Mount Olive amended its zoning ordinance to establish a commercial-recreational zone, in which amusement parks were permitted uses. Lakeland Industrial Park, Inc. and others (defendants) filed a petition for a referendum on the amended ordinance under the act. The township clerk found that the petition complied with the statutory requirements. Mount Olive sought, and the trial court granted, a declaratory judgment that the act’s referendum procedures did not apply to amendments to zoning ordinances. The parties who filed the referendum petitions in both cases appealed. The New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, considered the Sparta and Mount Olive cases together on appeal.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Carton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.