Toy v. Mackintosh

110 N.E. 1034 (1916)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
T
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Toy v. Mackintosh

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
110 N.E. 1034 (1916)

RW

Facts

Toy (plaintiff) swallowed a tooth during a dental procedure conducted by Mackintosh (defendant). Toy alleged Mackintosh's negligence caused this mishap. Toy also argued the swallowed tooth caused Toy to suffer internal injuries. Toy sued the dentist. At trial, Toy testified his symptoms improved after he coughed up the tooth weeks later. Toy produced no other evidence proving negligence or a link between the swallowed tooth and his injuries. Mackintosh, a skilled dentist, and four medical experts testified Mackintosh followed proper procedures. Their testimony indicated Toy's injuries resulted from unrelated medical conditions, which they described. The jury issued a verdict for Toy. On appeal to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Mackintosh argued no evidence supported Toy's allegations and therefore the judge should have directed the jury's verdict for Mackintosh.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Crosby, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 788,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Evidence

Key Terms