Toys “R” Us Inc. v. Feinberg
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
26 F. Supp. 2d 639 (1998)
- Written by Philip Glass, JD
Facts
The retailer Toys “R” Us, Inc. (Toys R Us) (plaintiff) specialized in the sale of toys and other family-oriented products throughout the United States but refrained from selling toy guns. Toys R Us registered a plethora of trademarks and domain names using “R” as an abbreviation for the word “are.” Richard Feinberg (defendant) owned and operated a firearms store initially called Guns Are Us, which made most of its gun sales in Massachusetts. However, Guns Are Us did make some gun sales over the internet, as well as some sales to New York firearms dealers. Although Feinberg ultimately renamed the company We Are Guns due to pressure from Toys R Us, the company’s domain name persisted as www.gunsareus.com. This provoked Toys R Us into filing a cause of action against Feinberg for damages and an injunction both against the domain name and against the use of Guns Are Us or Guns Are We as business names.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Schwartz, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.