Trade Development Bank v. Continental Insurance Co.

469 F.2d 35 (1972)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Trade Development Bank v. Continental Insurance Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
469 F.2d 35 (1972)

Facts

The Trade Development Bank (bank) (plaintiff) was a Swiss bank. The Continental Insurance Company (insurer) (defendant) issued a fidelity bond to the bank obligating the insurer to indemnify the bank for up to $5 million for any loss due to any bank employee’s dishonesty, fraud, or criminal act. Between 1969 and 1970, a bank employee in Switzerland fraudulently used the bank and the bank’s customers’ funds for his own securities transactions. The transactions proved to be unwise, resulting in a $2 million loss for the bank. The employee was able to perpetrate his fraud because Swiss banks could act as stockbrokers for their clients. The bank maintained record-keeping controls for authorized securities transactions, but the employee’s unauthorized transactions were either not registered or were falsely recorded in the bank’s records. The bank sought payment from the insurer pursuant to the fidelity bond. The bank sued the insurer upon the insurer’s refusal to pay.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mansfield, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership