Trahan v. First National Bank of Ruston
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
690 F.2d 466 (1982)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
In 1973, J. C. Trahan (plaintiff) put up 15,000 shares of Texas International Petroleum Corporation (TIPCO) stock as collateral for a loan from the First National Bank of Ruston (defendant). In 1977, Trahan repaid the loan, but the bank refused to return the stock, stating that the stock had been used as collateral for a separate loan to Resource Exploration, Inc., a company with which Trahan was associated. The pledge of this stock by Resource, however, was not valid. In 1978, Resource defaulted on its loan, and the bank sold the stock. The value of the stock on this date was $10.00 per share. Trahan sued the bank for conversion. In 1982, the district court found the bank guilty of conversion of the stock. The value of the stock at that time was $29.50 per share. The stock had reached a high price of $64.25 per share in 1981. As damages, the court ordered the bank to procure 15,000 shares of TIPCO stock—the bank had been sued by a purchaser of the stock, and the case was pending in state court, making the stock obtainable—and give it to Trahan. Both parties appealed the award of damages. The bank argued that damages should be the value of the stock at the time of conversion.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brown, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.