Tran v. Alphonse Hotel Corp.

281 F.3d 23 (2002)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Tran v. Alphonse Hotel Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
281 F.3d 23 (2002)

SR

Facts

On October 10, 1991, Tran (plaintiff) sued his former employers, The Carter Hotels and Hotel Kenmore (defendants), alleging that they failed to pay him sufficient wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Tran later discovered evidence suggesting that the defendants had bribed union officials in order to pay their employees less than the union rate. Based on this evidence, Tran moved to amend his complaint to add a claim under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) on July 8, 1997. The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted the motion, finding that although the statute of limitations on the RICO claim had expired, the RICO claim related back to the FLSA claim in the original complaint. The district court ultimately found in favor of Tran. The defendants appealed on the grounds that the RICO claim did not relate back to the original complaint.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Katzmann, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership