Tran v. Macha

213 S.W.3d 913 (2006)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Tran v. Macha

Texas Supreme Court
213 S.W.3d 913 (2006)

Play video

Facts

For several decades, the owners of two separate houses, lot 5 and lot 6, used a single driveway that led to garages on each of their properties. During this period, it was assumed that the driveway was on lot 5. However, in actuality, the driveway was on lot 6. In 1995, Minh Thu Tran and Norman Roser (defendants) bought lot 6. In 2001, William and Nita Macha (plaintiffs) purchased lot 5. When the Machas performed a survey, they discovered that the driveway was not on lot 5. The Machas then secured a quitclaim deed conveying to them any interest the previous owner of lot 5 might have acquired in the driveway through adverse possession. When Tran and Roser learned of the survey, they erected a fence around the driveway. The Machas sued. The trial court and appeals court ruled in favor of the Machas, holding that the previous owner’s use of the driveway, and all parties’ mistaken belief in the ownership of the driveway, sufficiently created an adverse possession.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curium)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 748,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership