Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hardison

432 U.S. 63 (1977)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hardison

United States Supreme Court
432 U.S. 63 (1977)

Play video

Facts

Section 703(a)(1) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (the Act), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1), prohibits employers from firing an employee based on the employee’s religion. In 1972, Congress amended Title VII of the Act to require that employers also make reasonable accommodations for an employee’s religious practices and observances. Title VII also provided that seniority and merit-based systems were permissible, as long as the systems did not discriminate based on religion. Larry Hardison (plaintiff) was an employee for Trans World Airlines, Inc. (TWA) (defendant), in TWA’s stores department in Kansas City. The stores department operated 24 hours per day and needed to be fully staffed at all times. TWA employees were scheduled based on a seniority system in which employees bid on shifts, with the most senior employees having the first choice of shift assignments. The seniority system was negotiated in a collective-bargaining agreement between TWA and the employees’ union. During his employment with TWA, Hardison joined the Worldwide Church of God, which required Hardison to observe the Sabbath between sunset on Friday and sunset on Saturday. Thus, Hardison was unable to work any shifts during those times. TWA refused to accommodate Hardison’s request not to be scheduled to work during the Sabbath and fired Hardison when he refused to report for work during those shifts. Hardison sued TWA for violating § 2000e-2(a)(1). The district court found in favor of TWA. The court of appeals reversed, ruling that TWA had failed to reasonably accommodate Hardison’s religious practice. TWA petitioned the United States Supreme Court for certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

Dissent (Marshall, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership