Transaero, Inc. v. La Fuerza Aerea Boliviana

30 F.3d 148 (1994)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Transaero, Inc. v. La Fuerza Aerea Boliviana

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
30 F.3d 148 (1994)

Facts

Transaero, Inc. (plaintiff) sold parts to La Fuerza Aerea Boliviana (the Bolivian Air Force) (defendant). Transaero sued the Bolivian Air Force in federal district court in New York for breach of contract. Transaero attempted to serve the Bolivian Air Force, but the Bolivian Air Force did not appear. As a result, the district court scheduled a default hearing. Transaero mailed notice to the Bolivian Air Force and other representatives of the Bolivian government. When none responded, the district court granted default judgment in favor of Transaero. The district court found that the requirements for service on a government agency or instrumentality under § 1608(b) of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (the act) were satisfied. Transaero registered the judgment in the district court for the District of Columbia. The Bolivian Air Force responded and moved to dismiss the case. The Bolivian Air Force argued that the district court lacked personal jurisdiction because service of process was not properly completed under the act. The Bolivian Air Force asserted that it was a “foreign state or political subdivision of a foreign state,” and service was therefore governed by § 1608(a) of the act. The Bolivian Air Force argued that the requirements for service under § 1608(a) were not met by Transaero, which never attempted to effect service under the requirements of § 1608(a). The district court held that the Bolivian Air Force was an agency or instrumentality of Bolivia, not a foreign state or political subdivision of a foreign state, so service under § 1608(b) was proper and gave the New York district court jurisdiction over the Bolivian Air Force. The Bolivian Air Force filed an interlocutory appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sentelle, J.)

Dissent (Mikva, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership