Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. Gault

198 F.2d 196 (1952)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. Gault

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
198 F.2d 196 (1952)

SC

Facts

Gault and others (plaintiffs) owned residences in Maryland. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation (Transcontinental) (defendant) built a compressor gas station near the plaintiffs’ homes. The station was approved by the Federal Power Commission and was necessary for the transmission of natural gas across the country. The plaintiffs brought suit for an injunction against Transcontinental, alleging that the noise and vibration from the gas station constituted a public nuisance. The district court found in favor of the plaintiffs, granting an injunction on two conditions: (1) the injunction must be delayed to give Transcontinental time to make changes to the station that would reduce the noise and vibration; and (2) if Transcontinental determined by a certain date that it could not reasonably ameliorate the noise and vibration, Transcontinental could request that the court consider different relief for the plaintiffs upon agreement with the determination, including pecuniary damages. Transcontinental appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership