Travel Services Network v. Presidential Financial Corp.

959 F. Supp. 135 (1997)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Travel Services Network v. Presidential Financial Corp.

United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
959 F. Supp. 135 (1997)

SH

Facts

Travel Services Network, Inc. (TSN) (plaintiff) acquired and operated travel agencies. On June 23, 1992, TSN entered into a secured loan agreement with Presidential Financial Corporation of Massachusetts (Presidential) (defendant) for a line of credit of $250,000 in order to finance the purchase of Kaplan Travel Bureau (Kaplan). The loan agreement granted Presidential the right to advance funds in its sole discretion and waived TSN rights to “demand, presentment, notice, protest, and notice of dishonor.” The parties thereafter executed an escrow agreement to establish a special account to finance the purchase of Kaplan, but the escrow agreement did not require Presidential to disburse the $250,000 contemplated; TSN instead relied on Presidential’s oral promises, but no such funds were ever advanced under the escrow agreement. Presidential did, however, advance funds under the loan agreement. On February 19, 1993, Presidential informed TSN that it was in default of the loan agreement and that it would no longer advance funds under the loan agreement until Presidential was satisfied that TSN could honor its outstanding obligations to another creditor whose agreement TSN was in default. TSN terminated its relationship with Presidential shortly thereafter, and TSN entered into a new, less favorable financing arrangement that resulted in its demise. TSN brought suit against Presidential for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, among other claims, arguing that Presidential: (1) failed to provide reasonable notice of its intention to restrict or terminate the line of credit; (2) provided false assurances to direct inquiries of TSN that its line of credit was in no danger; and (3) failed to adhere to oral promises to advance funds under the escrow agreement for the purchase of Kaplan. Presidential moved for summary judgment on each claim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Arterton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership