Travellers International, AG v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

722 F.Supp. 1087 (1989)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Travellers International, AG v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
722 F.Supp. 1087 (1989)

  • Written by Lauren Petersen, JD

Facts

Travellers International, AG (Travellers) (plaintiff), offered international vacation tours. It contracted with Trans World Airlines, Inc. (TWA) (defendant), an international airline, to provide European vacation packages that TWA marketed as “Getaway Tours.” Under the contract, Travellers designed each year’s Getaway Tours, created marketing brochures for TWA’s use, and operated the tours. TWA sold the Getaway Tours and provided the air transportation to the tours. The price of Getaway Tours was comprised of the cost of airfare plus the cost of the land tour. TWA was compensated for the airfares in full and received a percentage of the tours’ retail price. In 1984, after nearly 15 years of partnership, Travellers and TWA entered into a contract requiring Travellers to produce at least 100,000 brochures and, as in the past, develop and conduct tours. This contract’s terms commenced in 1986 and extended through the end of 1991. TWA changed owners in 1985, as did Travellers in 1986. The long-standing relationship between the two companies soured under their new ownerships. TWA renegotiated its percentage profit from Getaway Tours and reduced the price and number of brochures that it received from Travellers. Just three months later, TWA terminated its contract with Travellers. Travellers sued TWA seeking a permanent injunction requiring TWA’s specific performance of the 1984 contract. At trial, Travellers provided evidence that 90 to 95 percent of its business came from its contract with TWA. Additionally, the parties provided evidence that performance of the contract would be profitable for TWA.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ward, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership