Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
  • T
  • Tri M Petroleum Co. v. Getty Oil Co.; Ridgwa…Tri M Petroleum Co. v. Getty Oil Co.; Ridgway v. Shell Oil Co.
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

Tri M Petroleum Co. v. Getty Oil Co.; Ridgway v. Shell Oil Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
792 F.3d 558 (5th Cir. 1986)


In Tri M Petroleum Co. v. Getty Oil Co., Getty Oil Company (Getty) (defendant) was the lessee in two oil and gas leases on tracts of land. Tri M Petroleum Company (Tri M) (plaintiff) acquired a top lease on the tracts of land. System Fuels, Inc. (System) filed a petition with the State Oil and Gas Board of Mississippi (Board) to unitize several tracts of land, including the Getty leaseholds. The Board granted System’s petition. Getty refused to participate in the drilling costs or to farmout its interest in the lands. System drilled a well within the unit, but not on Getty’s leasehold. The Getty leases’ primary terms expired. Tri M sued Getty, seeking cancellation of the Getty leases. Because of System’s drilling, the district court declined to cancel the Getty leases. Tri M appealed. In the separate case of Ridgeway v. Shell Oil Co., C.R. Ridgway (plaintiff) issued an oil and gas lease to Shell Oil Company (Shell) (defendant). Shell and Pursue Energy Corporation (Pursue) wanted to drill in the same general area. Shell and Pursue each filed a petition with the Board to unitize all lands within the area. The Board granted Pursue’s petition, which included the Shell leasehold, and denied Shell’s petition. Pursue drilled a well, but not on the Shell leasehold. The primary term of Shell’s lease expired. Ridgway sued Shell, seeking cancellation of the Shell lease. Because of Pursue’s drilling, the district court declined to cancel the lease. Ridgway appealed. Ridgway’s appeal and Tri M’s appeal were consolidated in the court of appeals.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Politz, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 450,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 450,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial