Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,800+ case briefs...

Tri-State Hotel Co. v. Sphinx Investment Co.

Kansas Supreme Court
510 P.2d 1223 (1973)


Facts

Tri-State Hotel Company (Tri-State) (plaintiff) owned a hotel and several other adjacent pieces of properties. Tri-State entered into a series of contracts with Sphinx Investment Company (Sphinx) (defendant) for the sale of the hotel and land. The contracts all included a marketable-title provision, which provided that Sphinx had the option to cancel the contract if Tri-State failed to deliver a marketable title or could in the alternative choose to waive the title defect and continue with the agreement based upon whatever title Tri-State could deliver. Tri-State and Sphinx were both represented by the same attorney, John Eberhardt, in the matter. During the title-search process, Eberhardt eventually discovered that title to one narrow strip of land under the hotel was in fact held by a defunct corporation. Eberhardt informed Tri-State and Sphinx of this defect. Eberhardt assured Sphinx that although the defect technically amounted to a merchantable defect, Tri-State had undoubtedly acquired title to the land through adverse possession. Eberhardt admitted, however, that any effort to quiet title by Tri-State would not be able to be completed by the date required in the contract. Sphinx, concerned about the potential risks of continuing with the contract under this defect, informed Tri-State and Eberhardt that it was electing to cancel the contract and demanded the return of its deposit money. Tri-State sued Sphinx to retain the deposit, alleging that the title defect did not amount to a merchantable defect sufficient to trigger a right to cancel for Sphinx. The trial court entered judgment for Sphinx, and Tri-State appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kaul, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 498,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 498,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial