Tribune Co. v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
125 T.C. 110 (2005)

- Written by Kelli Lanski, JD
Facts
Tribune Co. (plaintiff) was the successor-in-interest to Times Mirror Co. (TMC), which owned all of the stock in the legal-publishing company Matthew Bender. Reed Elsevier, another publishing company, acquired all of Matthew Bender’s stock. To complete the acquisition, the companies engineered a complicated series of steps. First, Reed Elsevier created a new merger subsidiary (MergerSub) with $1.375 billion. Reed Elsevier then created another corporation (MB Parent) and transferred some voting stock of MergerSub in exchange for voting stock of MB Parent. MergerSub also purchased additional common stock of MB Parent using its $1.375 billion. MergerSub then merged with Matthew Bender, with Matthew Bender surviving. After the merger, MB Parent transferred the $1.375 billion it received from MergerSub to a wholly owned LLC and designated TMC as the manager, giving TMC control over the $1.375 billion. In addition, TMC owned 100 percent of the common stock of MB Parent, and Reed Elsevier owned 100 percent of the preferred stock of MB Parent. Tribune asserted that the Matthew Bender acquisition qualified as a tax-free corporate reorganization. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (defendant) determined that the transaction was subject to tax because Tribune’s predecessor, TMC, received cash in addition to stock, making the transaction a sale, not a reorganization. Tribune sued in the United States Tax Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cohen, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.