Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Triffin v. Dillabough

716 A.2d 605 (1998)

Case BriefQ&ARelatedOptions
From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...

Triffin v. Dillabough

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

716 A.2d 605 (1998)

Facts

Stacey Dillabough and Robert Lynn (defendants) presented several stolen money orders for payment at Chuckie Enterprises, Inc. (Chuckie’s), in Pennsylvania. The money orders were printed by American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (American Express) (defendant) and contained the pre-printed signature of American Express’s chairman. However, the money orders were blank as to the amount, sender, payee, and date. The backs of the money orders stated that the amount would not be paid if the orders had been altered or stolen or if an endorsement was missing or forged. Chuckie’s paid the face amounts of the money orders to Dillabough and Lynn. American Express refused to pay Chuckie’s for the money orders. Chuckie’s sold and assigned all of its rights and interest in the money orders to Robert Triffin (plaintiff). Triffin sued Dillabough, Lynn, and American Express. The trial court entered default judgments against Dillabough and Lynn. The trial court also held that the money orders were not negotiable instruments and entered judgment for American Express. The superior court reversed with respect to American Express, holding that the money orders were negotiable instruments and that Triffin had status as a holder in due course and could recover the face amounts of the money orders. American Express appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Newman, J.)

Dissent (Castille, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 518,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions and answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 22,300 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership