Trillium Brokerage Services, LLC

AWC No. 20070076782-01 (2010)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Trillium Brokerage Services, LLC

Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
AWC No. 20070076782-01 (2010)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Trillium Brokerage Services, LLC (defendant), formerly known as Trillium Trading LLC (Trillium) (defendant), was a member firm of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) (plaintiff). Trillium, Chief Compliance Officer Rosemarie Johnson, Trading Director Daniel Balber, Senior Vice President of Trading Frank Raffaele, Vice President of Trading James Hochleutner, and traders Brian Gutbrod, Bradley Jaffe, Tal Plotkin, John Raffaele, Michael Raffaele, Tal Sharon, and Samuel Yoon (collectively, the settling employees) (defendants) submitted a letter of acceptance, waiver, and consent to FINRA in order to settle alleged violations of NASD conduct rules. Trillium and the settling employees consented to the entry of the following findings by FINRA: from November 1, 2006, though January 31, 2007, Trillium, by and through nine proprietary traders, engaged in layering conduct to take advantage of other firms’ algorithmic trading; entered into NASDAQ’s quotation and trading system and the New York Stock Exchange’s marketplace system limit orders that were at or improved the NASDAQ best bid or offer; obtained execution of the orders at favorable prices by entering numerous non-bona fide orders on the side of the market opposite the limit orders at prices outside the NASDAQ best bid or offer to create the appearance of substantial selling or buying interest; after obtaining execution of the limit orders, canceled the non-bona fide orders; repeated the trading activity on the other side of the market; and bought and sold securities using this strategy more than 46,000 times, obtaining profits of over $575,000, and retaining over $173,000; and, as a result, violated NASD Rule 2110 (requiring members to observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade), Rule 2120 (prohibiting members from effecting transactions in, or inducing the purchase or sale of, any security by means of any manipulative, deceptive, or fraudulent device), Rule 3310 (prohibiting members from publishing or circulating any communication that purported to quote the bid or ask price for any security unless the member believed the quotation represented a bona fide bid for, or offer of, the security), and IM-3310 (providing that it would be inconsistent with Rules 2110, 2120, and 3310 for a member to publish or circulate any quotation for a security without having reasonable cause to believe that the quotation was bona fide, not fictitious, and not published or circulated for any fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative purpose).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership