Trimboli v. Kinkel

123 N.E. 205 (1919)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Trimboli v. Kinkel

New York Court of Appeals
123 N.E. 205 (1919)

SC

Facts

Aaron Clark and Harriet Anderson owned certain property as tenants in common. Clark died with a will granting the power to sell the land and divide the proceeds to the executor of his estate. The executor conveyed Clark’s undivided interest to Anderson in exchange for an interest in another property. Anderson conveyed the property in question to Frederick Grimme and the property was eventually conveyed to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs hired the defendant, an attorney, to conduct a title search for the property. The defendant conducted a title search and told the plaintiffs that the title was marketable. However, the power to sell property and distribute the proceeds from the sale is not the same as the power to exchange property for other property. As a result, the executor’s exchange was invalid, a flaw in the title that the defendant did not report. The plaintiffs, unaware of the flaw, purchased the property and subsequently attempted to sell the same. Upon the purchasers’ title search, the purchasers found the flawed title and refused to consummate the sale. The plaintiffs sued the defendant for negligence. The defendant argued that the title flaw was cured by adverse possession. The plaintiffs noted, however, that the defendant had never previously mentioned or supplied evidence of adverse possession. The trial court dismissed the plaintiffs’ complaint. The appellate court reversed, finding that the defendant was negligent. The defendant appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cardozo, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership