Triple A Contractors, Inc. v. Rural Water District No. 4, Neosho County
Kansas Supreme Court
603 P.2d 184 (1979)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
On March 4, 1976, Rural Water District No. 4, Neosho County, Kansas (Rural Water) (defendant) issued an invitation for bids for the construction of a water distribution and storage system. In order to guarantee that the selected contractor entered into a construction contract, Rural Water required that contractors submit bids with a bid bond in the amount of 5% of the total bid. On March 24, 1976, the bids were opened. Triple A Contractors, Inc. (Triple A) (plaintiff) had submitted the lowest bid for $812,753.00. This bid was $169,079.50 lower than the second lowest bid. Triple A’s bid was low enough that both parties suspected an error had occurred. On March 27, 1976, Triple A discovered a clerical error. On March 29, 1976, Triple A informed Rural Water’s engineer of the error. On March 31, 1976, Triple A sent a letter requesting that Rural Water allow Triple A to withdraw its bid. On April 21, 1976, Rural Water’s board voted to accept Triple A’s bid. Triple A rejected the contract and brought suit seeking a cancellation of its bid and its bid bond. The district court held that Triple A’s unilateral mistake would not excuse Triple A’s nonperformance of the bid contract and denied Triple A’s petition. Triple A appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
Dissent (Prager, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.