Troman v. Wood

340 N.E.2d 292 (1975)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Troman v. Wood

Illinois Supreme Court
340 N.E.2d 292 (1975)

Facts

Mary Troman (plaintiff), a private figure, sued Chicago Sun-Times (Sun-Times) reporter Kingsley Wood and Sun-Times publisher Field Enterprises, Inc. (defendants) in Illinois state court. Troman sought actual damages for injury to her reputation following the publication of a Sun-Times article authored by Wood. Wood was dismissed from the case, leaving Field Enterprises as the sole defendant. Field Enterprises argued that, as a matter of policy, Illinois should adopt the actual-malice standard articulated by the Supreme Court. However, Field Enterprises conceded that the actual-malice standard was not constitutionally mandated. A motion to dismiss filed by Field Enterprises was granted. Troman appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Schaeffer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership