Tropicana Hotel Corporation v. Speer

692 P.2d 499 (1985)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Tropicana Hotel Corporation v. Speer

Nevada Supreme Court
692 P.2d 499 (1985)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Donald Speer (plaintiff) was hired as the general manager of the Tropicana Hotel by Mitzi Stauffer Briggs, controlling owner of the Tropicana Hotel Corporation (defendant). Speer agreed to work for Tropicana Hotel after negotiations with Briggs at her home. Each party was accompanied by counsel. Speer wanted equity in Tropicana Hotel in addition to his salary. Briggs and Speer ultimately agreed on terms of an employment contract but not the terms of how stock in Tropicana Hotel would be transferred to Speer. Speer wanted $100,000 worth of equity after taxes, but the parties could not work out a satisfactory arrangement to minimize tax consequences. Speer began working at Tropicana Hotel without executing a written employment agreement soon after the negotiation with Briggs. Two months after Speer’s employment began, Briggs sent Speer a signed employment agreement. Speer withheld his signature because he wanted to hold off until he received a satisfactory stock-option agreement from Briggs. Within the first year of Speer’s employment, the hotel closed due to a culinary strike. Speer and Briggs began to disagree over management of the hotel. Then, two of Speer’s subordinates were fired by Tropicana Hotel’s executive committee, so Speer left the hotel. Speer filed suit against Tropicana Hotel, alleging breaches of the oral employment contract and oral stock-option agreement. The district court found that Tropicana Hotel breached the employment contract but that the stock-option agreement was not valid. Speer appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gunderson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership