Logourl black
From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...

Troutman v. Southern Railway Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
441 F.2d 586 (1971)


Facts

When the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) directed Southern Railway Company (Southern) (defendant) to increase shipping rates in 1963, Southern asked attorney Robert Troutman, Jr. (plaintiff) to appeal to the federal government on its behalf. The ICC order was likely to cause substantial financial harm to Southern, which initiated a lawsuit challenging the order. Southern engaged Troutman because he was a personal friend of President John F. Kennedy and had access to other government officials. Southern asked him to make a case before the President and the Department of Justice (DOJ) that the ICC order was not in the national interest. In exchange, Southern promised to consider developing property with Troutman. Troutman’s efforts worked: the DOJ filed an opposition to the ICC in Southern’s court action, and the order was struck down. After it grew clear that Southern would not join Troutman in his proposed property development, Troutman sued Southern to recover the reasonable value of services rendered to it. Southern defended the suit on the grounds that its contract with Troutman was unenforceable because it violated public policy. At trial, the court denied a motion for directed verdict by Southern. The jury reached a verdict for Troutman, and Southern appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Wisdom, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 129,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 177 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.