Truelove v. Northeast Capital & Advisory, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
95 N.Y.2d 220, 738 N.E.2d 770, 715 N.Y.S.2d 366 (2000)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
William Truelove (plaintiff) began working for the investment-banking firm Northeast Capital & Advisory, Inc. (Northeast) (defendant) in June of 1996. Truelove elected to receive a $40,000 annual salary with eligibility for a bonus/profit-sharing pool. Truelove’s employment offer from Northeast explained that any bonus paid to Truelove would reflect a combination of Truelove’s performance and Northeast’s performance. Northeast’s chief executive officer (CEO) issued memos explaining that the bonus/profit-sharing pool would be created only if Northeast met a minimum revenue target and would be calculated using a graduated percentage schedule of Northeast’s revenue. The memos also indicated that the CEO had the sole discretion to allocate bonuses, that bonuses would be paid in quarterly installments, and that each installment payment was contingent on the receiving employee still being employed at Northeast. In 1997, Northeast established a bonus pool of $240,000. Northeast’s CEO allocated $160,000 from the bonus pool to Truelove, and Northeast paid Truelove his first quarterly bonus installment of $40,000. However, Truelove subsequently resigned from Northeast, and Northeast refused to pay Truelove the three remaining bonus installments. Truelove sued Northeast in New York state court, alleging a violation of article 6 of New York’s Labor Law. Specifically, Truelove asserted that his bonus payments constituted wages under Labor Law § 190(1), which defined wages as an employee’s earnings for labor or services rendered. According to Truelove, Northeast’s refusal to pay the remaining bonus installments was an unlawful deduction from his wages. The trial court concluded that Truelove’s bonus could not be considered wages under article 6 and granted summary judgment for Northeast. The appellate division affirmed. Truelove appealed to the New York Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Levine, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.