Truman v. Thomas

611 P.2d 902 (1980)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Truman v. Thomas

California Supreme Court
611 P.2d 902 (1980)

Facts

Rena Truman was a patient of Dr. Claude Thomas (defendant) for six years. Thomas never performed a pap smear on Truman and medical records contained no reference to a recommendation that Truman undergo a pap smear. In 1970, Truman died from an inoperable cancerous tumor in her cervix. Truman’s children (plaintiffs) brought a wrongful-death lawsuit against Thomas, alleging that Thomas’s failure to inform Truman of the risks of not undergoing a pap smear had led to Truman’s death. Truman’s children presented expert testimony stating that if Truman had undergone a pap smear, the tumor would likely have been discovered in time to save Truman’s life. Thomas testified that although he had not specifically informed Truman of the risks of not undergoing a pap smear, he had regularly informed her of the need for a pap smear. Thomas also testified that he had twice offered to perform the procedure and defer the cost, but Truman refused on account of the cost and because she didn’t feel like having the test performed. Truman’s children asked the court to instruct the jury that the failure of a physician to disclose to a patient the risks of refusing a test could make the physician liable if a reasonably prudent patient would not have refused the test had the patient been adequately informed of the risks of refusal. The judge refused the jury instruction. The jury found for Thomas. Truman’s children appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bird, C.J.)

Dissent (Clark, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership