Trust of Gurney

59 N.Y.S.3d 587, 152 A.D.3d 1122 (2017)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Trust of Gurney

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department
59 N.Y.S.3d 587, 152 A.D.3d 1122 (2017)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Margaret Gurney placed her assets in a living trust when she could no longer manage her own affairs. The trust agreement directed the trustee (plaintiff) to use the remaining trust assets to pay Gurney’s debts and make specific gifts when Gurney died, then divide and give the bulk of estate to three charitable institutions. Specifically, Gurney wanted to give 20 percent to St. Mary’s Roman Catholic School, where she had enjoyed volunteering. But the school had been closed for four years when Gurney died, and its grounds sold. The school had not merged into another parochial school, as none existed in the area. The trustee petitioned the court for permission to divide the school’s share between the two other institutions that Gurney named in her will. But St. Mary’s Roman Catholic Church, New York, which had operated the school, and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany, New York (defendants), argued that the school’s share should go instead to its ministry and a diocesan scholarship under the cy pres doctrine. The trustee countered that Gurney wanted to support only local institutions in her adopted hometown of Oneonta, had no interest in Roman Catholic education itself, and felt she had satisfied her duty to give to the parish by donating to it during her lifetime. The trust agreement made gifts to institutions only in Oneonta, did not mention Gurney’s faith, and did not make any gifts to the parish or other Catholic institutions. The court agreed with the trustee that the school’s share should go to the other institutions Gurney had chosen. The church and the parish appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Devine, J.)

Dissent (Lynch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership