Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Trustees of Union College v. Members of the Schenectady City Council

Appellate Division, New York Supreme Court
690 N.E.2d 862 (1997)


Facts

The General Electric Realty Plot (Realty Plot) is an area of Schenectady with turn-of-the-century residences. In 1978, the city adopted an ordinance establishing a Single Family Historical District (Historical District). The Historical District included the Realty Plot and limited property uses to large, single-family residences. The ordinance originally allowed for education, religious, and other institutions to apply for special-use permits within the Historic District. In 1984, the city amended the ordinance to further limit uses in the Historical District, including prohibiting educational uses entirely. Accordingly, educational institutions were no longer allowed to seek a special-use permit. The city’s zoning code had always allowed property owners to seek a zoning variance by showing practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. The code also allowed a private party unable or unwilling to seek a variance or special-use permit to seek an amendment to the code itself. Union College (plaintiff) owns seven properties located in the Historical District and adjacent to plaintiff’s campus. In 1992, Union College proposed that the ordinance be amended to include nonresidential educational use as a special-permit use in the Historical District. When no action was taken on Union College’s proposal, in 1995, Union College sued the city, its mayor, and the Schenectady City Council (Council) (defendants), arguing that the city code was unconstitutional on its face. The trial court found for Union College. The defendants appealed. The appellate court affirmed, and the defendants appealed again.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Kaye, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.