TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.

426 U.S. 438 (1976)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.

United States Supreme Court
426 U.S. 438 (1976)

Play video

Facts

In 1969, National Industries, Inc. (National) (defendant) acquired 34 percent of the voting stock of TSC Industries, Inc. (TSC) (defendant). Several National executives were placed on TSC’s board of directors. Also, National’s president, Stanley Yarmuth, became chairman of TSC’s board, and National’s executive vice president, Charles Simonelli, became chairman of TSC’s executive committee. Later that year, TSC’s board, with the National members abstaining, approved a plan to merge with National. National and TSC issued a joint proxy statement to shareholders to solicit authority to vote the shareholders’ shares in favor of the proposal. The solicitation was successful, and the deal was approved. TSC shareholder Northway, Inc. (plaintiff) sued TSC and National, alleging that the proxy statement was materially misleading and therefore violated § 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In support, Northway pointed to, among other things, the fact that although the proxy statement disclosed National’s 34 percent ownership of TSC shares and placement in five of TSC’s 10 director roles, the statement did not disclose Yarmuth’s and Simonelli’s chairman roles. Northway moved for summary judgment. The district court denied the motion, determining that a trial was necessary because the materiality of the omissions was a question of fact. The court of appeals reversed in part, concluding that some omissions were material as a matter of law because a reasonable shareholder might consider the information important. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 777,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership