Tucker v. Commissioner

69 T.C. 675 (1978)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Tucker v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
69 T.C. 675 (1978)

JC

Facts

Carol Tucker (plaintiff) was a teacher in New York. In 1973, Tucker participated in a 21-day teacher’s strike. The teachers who participated in the strike had twice their daily pay rate deducted from their wages for all days on strike as sanctions for violating state law. Tucker ultimately was docked $1,509 by her employer. These sums were included in the statement of earnings supplied by the school and in the category for wages, tips, or other compensation. Tucker and her husband then included this $1,509 as income on their tax return and deducted the same amount as an employee business expense. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the commissioner) (defendant) found a deficiency on the basis that the $1,509 could not be deducted pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 162(f), which prohibits deduction for any amounts paid to a governmental entity for violation of the law. The commissioner argued that Tucker was assessed a penalty due to participating in the strike, and the penalty was discharged from Tucker’s normal salary, which made it taxable income.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wilbur, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership