Tucson Herpetological Society v. Salazar

566 F.3d 870 (2009)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Tucson Herpetological Society v. Salazar

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
566 F.3d 870 (2009)

Facts

In 1993 the secretary of the United States Department of Interior (the secretary) (defendant) proposed listing the flat-tailed horned lizard (the lizard) as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act due to manmade developments that destroyed an estimated one-fifth of the lizard’s range. In 1997 the secretary issued a final determination withdrawing the proposed listing, relying on both a multistate and a federal conservation agreement designed to maintain the population and the lack of data showing population declines. The 1997 withdrawal was challenged in two rounds of litigation, in which the Ninth Circuit twice found that the secretary and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service had failed to properly analyze whether the threatened and lost portion of the lizard’s range was significant under the Endangered Species Act. In 2006, after the second remand from the Ninth Circuit, the secretary again withdrew the proposed listing. Although acknowledging that the existing population studies were limited and inconclusive, the secretary found that the lost range was not significant. The Tucson Herpetological Society (plaintiff) challenged the withdrawal in the district court, and the district court granted summary judgment for the secretary. The Tucson Herpetological Society appealed the granting of summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tashima, J.)

Dissent (Noonan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership