United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
306 F.3d 1138 (2002)
In 2000, the president of the United States (president) (defendant) established the Giant Sequoia National Monument (monument) by proclamation, under the authority of the Antiquities Act (Act), 16 U.S.C. § 431. The monument encompassed 327,769 acres of land in California’s Sequoia National Forest, including giant sequoia trees and their surrounding ecosystem. Tulare County (county) (plaintiff) owned land within and near the monument. The county, along with public and private entities that used the monument area for business and recreational purposes (plaintiffs), sought declaratory and injunctive relief against the president and the federal government (defendant) in district court. The plaintiffs claimed that the monument proclamation violated the Act and the Property Clause of the United States Constitution. The district court dismissed the complaint, finding that only a facial review was appropriate. The plaintiffs appealed, arguing that the monument proclamation violated the Act by (1) failing to identify objects of historic or scientific interest with reasonable specificity; (2) designating nonqualifying objects for protection under the Act, such as ecosystems and scenic vistas; (3) not confining the monument’s size to the smallest area necessary for proper care and management of the protected objects, as required by the Act; and (4) increasing the likelihood that the protected objects by the Act would be harmed by fire. The plaintiffs also claimed that the proclamation violated the National Forest Management Act of 1976 (NFMA) by unlawfully withdrawing land from the national-forest system.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rogers, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.