Tulk v. Moxhay
England and Wales Court of Chancery
41 Eng. Rep. 1143 (1848)
- Written by Dennis Chong, JD
Facts
Tulk (plaintiff) owned Leicester Square, a plot of land that contained houses and a square garden. In 1808, he sold a portion to Elms, conveying the portion in fee but containing a covenant stipulating that the square garden must be maintained and that no houses were to be built on that ground. The covenant purported to bind Elms as well as his heirs, executors, and administrators. Elms’s land was eventually conveyed to Moxhay (defendant), whose deed did not contain the same covenant, although he took the land with knowledge of it. Moxhay desired to build upon the square garden. Tulk, who still owned several houses on the land, sought an injunction preventing Moxhay from disturbing the square garden. The lower court granted the injunction, and Moxhay appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cottenham, L.C.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
