Tun v. Whitticker

398 F.3d 899 (2005)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Tun v. Whitticker

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
398 F.3d 899 (2005)

Facts

Brandon Tun (plaintiff) and three of his teammates on the Wayne High School wrestling team were photographed by the team’s student manager while they showered in the school locker room. The four wrestlers played along, although it was unclear whether they believed the manager had film in his camera. Joselyn Whitticker (defendant), the school’s principal, began expulsion proceedings against the students, citing a rule that listed participating in public indecency on school property as an expellable offense. Tun was expelled on the grounds that he allowed naked photos of himself to be taken in the locker room. Tun successfully appealed the decision and had the expulsion expunged from his disciplinary record. Tun then sued Whitticker pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Whitticker’s attempt to expel him was such an egregious exercise of poor judgment that it violated his substantive-due-process rights under the United States Constitution. A magistrate judge of the district court ruled in favor of Tun, and Whitticker appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Evans, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership