Turbon Products, Inc. v. United States

16 C.I.T. 95 (1992)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Turbon Products, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade
16 C.I.T. 95 (1992)

Facts

Turbon Products, Inc. (Turbon) (plaintiff) requested that its trial against the United States Customs Service (customs) (defendant) be held in Philadelphia rather than in New York City. Turbon’s justification was that the witnesses and much of the evidence were located closer to Philadelphia. Customs argued that the factors outlined in Zoltek Corp. v. United States weighed in favor of having the trial in New York City. Specifically, Turbon had filed a premature trial request rather than asking for a motion of extension of time, the questions involved were more likely to be questions of law than fact, the trial witnesses were in New York City, the testimony of witnesses who could not travel to New York could be recorded, there was no need to have the case near the port of importation, and it was more expensive to bring all of customs’ witnesses and the court to Philadelphia than to bring Turbon’s witnesses to New York. The court agreed with customs, and Turbon filed for reconsideration.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Musgrave, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership