Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Turkmen v. Hasty

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
789 F.3d 218 (2015)


Facts

In the weeks following the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 (9/11), Ibrahim Turkmen and seven other non-resident males of Arab or Muslim descent (plaintiffs) were arrested and detained by law enforcement officials based on a hold-until-cleared policy, under which the plaintiffs could not be released from custody until the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) affirmatively cleared the plaintiffs of terrorist ties. Even though the plaintiffs and nearly 800 other foreign nationals had no ties to the 9/11 attacks, they were held at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) and the Passaic County Jail (Passaic) for months, were in solitary confinement for 23 hours per day, were regularly strip-searched, and were routinely intimidated and punished based on their ethnicity and religion. The plaintiffs filed a class-action suit in federal district court against former MDC Warden Dennis Hasty and seven other city and federal Department of Justice (DOJ) officials, including the attorney general and FBI director (defendants), seeking damages resulting from the plaintiffs’ confinement in violation of the Due Process, Equal Protection, and Free Exercise Clauses, as well as the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. The DOJ and MDC defendants moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim on qualified-immunity grounds. The district court granted the motion, and the plaintiffs appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Pooler, J. and Wesley, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence/Dissent (Raggi, J.)

The concurrence/dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the judge’s concurrence in part and dissent in part.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.