Turman v. Ward’s Home Improvement
Virginia Circuit Court
26 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d 175 (1995)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
G. Michael Turman and Carolyn Turman (defendants) contracted with Ward’s Home Improvement, Inc. (Ward) (plaintiff) for the construction of a home on the Turmans’ property. In consideration of the contract, the Turmans executed a deed-of-trust note in the amount of $107,500, payable to Ward. Ward subsequently assigned the note to Robert Pomerantz (plaintiff). Ward did not indorse or mark the assigned note with any further notations. When Ward failed to complete the construction of the home, Pomerantz demanded payment on the note from the Turmans, contending that his status as a holder in due course permitted him to enforce the note.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Haley, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.