Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Turner Holdings, Inc. v. Howard Miller Clock Co.

United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan
657 F.Supp. 1370 (1987)


Facts

On November 3, 1981, Turner Holdings, Inc. (THI) (plaintiff) entered an agreement with Howard Miller Clock Company (HMCC), a furniture manufacturing company. THI agreed to locate candidates for acquisition and to advise HMCC on the best way to proceed towards an acquisition. The contract provided that HMCC would pay THI a success fee upon the successful acquisition of a company. HMCC had the right to terminate the contract at any time, but was required to pay THI a success fee for acquisitions made up to two years past the termination date. A post-termination success fee was only applicable to the acquisition of a company that was “under consideration” during the term of the contract. During the term of the contract, THI researched Hekman Furniture Company (Hekman), which was not for sale at the time. THI discussed the possible acquisition of Hekman at length with HMCC. On December 1, 1982, the parties mutually terminated the contract. In the fall of 1983, HMCC purchased Hekman for $7.7 million. THI sued to recover $177,000.00, on grounds that THI was entitled to a success fee because HMCC had been “under consideration” during the term of the contract. At trial, HMCC argued that the term “under consideration” was ambiguous. HMCC introduced testimony that it believed a company was only “under consideration” if, among other things, the company was on sale during the term of the contract.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Hillman, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.