Turner v. American Mutual Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
390 So.2d 1330 (1980)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
Silton Turner (plaintiff) was a 20-year-old unskilled laborer. Turner was mentally challenged and limited in terms of academic skills and eye-hand motor coordination. Turner worked as a logger for American Mutual Insurance Company (American Mutual) (defendant). While cutting and moving logs in the woods at work, Turner seriously injured his right foot. Turner underwent two operations with Dr. Cedric Lowrey, who determined that Turner had a 30 to 40 percent disability of the foot and that the foot was easily susceptible to re-injury. Turner received workers’ compensation benefits based on his injury. Lowrey later determined that Turner could resume work on a trial basis, and American Mutual terminated Turner’s benefits. Turner sued American Mutual for his benefits on the ground that he was permanently disabled. Turner relied on the testimony of an orthopedist, who determined that Turner could not perform the duties of a logger because he could not stand or walk for extended periods. A vocational psychiatrist testified at trial that there were jobs available in Louisiana at which a person with Turner’s disability could work. No testimony was given as to whether there were jobs within a reasonable proximity to Turner’s residence at which a person with Turner’s physical and mental limitations could work. The trial court held that Turner was not disabled, as gainful employment was available to Turner in Louisiana. The court of appeal affirmed. Turner appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dennis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.