Turner v. Lyons
Louisiana Court of Appeal
867 So. 2d 13 (2004)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Emma Turner (plaintiff) was crossing the street when she was struck by a police car being driven by New Orleans police officer Michael Lyons (defendant). Turner suffered two broken legs and a broken arm in the accident, and she also suffered a heart attack later that night. Turner sued Lyons and the City of New Orleans (defendants) to recover for her injuries. Turner died from heart complications a few months after filing her lawsuit. Turner’s six children (plaintiffs) became substitute plaintiffs in Turner’s action and brought a wrongful-death action against Lyons and the city. At a bench trial, Turner’s children presented testimony from Dr. Frank Griffith, an accident-reconstruction expert. Griffith testified that he based his opinion about the accident on the accident report, an internal New Orleans Police Department report, Lyons’s deposition, the deposition of a forensic pathologist, Lyons’s trial testimony, the specifications of the type of police car Lyons had been driving, traffic regulations, and a textbook and videos on pedestrian-accident reconstructions. Griffith further testified that he visited the scene of the accident and took measurements and photographs. After hearing the evidence in the case, the trial court found Lyons 100 percent at fault for the accident and awarded damages to Turner’s children. Lyons and the city appealed to the Louisiana Court of Appeal, asserting that Griffith’s opinion testimony was inadmissible because the accident report and internal police report reviewed by Griffith were inadmissible hearsay.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Love, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.