From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
Turner v. Memorial Medical Center
Illinois Supreme Court
911 N.E.2d 369 (2009)
Facts
Mark Turner (plaintiff) was a respirator therapist employed at Memorial Medical Center (Memorial) (defendant). The Joint Commission was an independent, nonprofit organization that established healthcare standards and evaluated organizations’ compliance with those standards. The Joint Commission performed an on-site survey of Memorial to determine whether Memorial would continue to receive Joint Commission accreditation. Memorial used a computer charting program that allowed medical professionals to electronically chart a patient’s file. The Joint Commission standard required that electronic charting be performed immediately after care was provided to a patient. Memorial required that such charting be performed merely at some point during the medical professional’s shift. Turner was asked to speak with a Joint Commission surveyor. During the meeting, Turner pointed out the discrepancy between the Joint Commission’s standard of immediate reporting and Memorial’s less-strict policy. Turner also told the surveyor that Memorial’s deviation from the Joint Commission’s policy jeopardized patient safety. Turner alleged that he was fired by Memorial as a result of these statements. Turner brought suit, arguing that Memorial retaliatorily discharged him for truthful statements, in violation of the public policy of patient safety by firing him. The trial court dismissed Turner’s complaint. The appellate court upheld the dismissal. The case was then brought before the state supreme court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Freeman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.