Turner v. Wong

832 A.2d 340 (2003)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Turner v. Wong

New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
832 A.2d 340 (2003)

Facts

Delois Turner (plaintiff) filed a complaint of intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) against Nancy Wong (defendant) for racial slurs uttered against her. Turner, an African American, purchased a donut from Wong’s donut store. Turner tasted the donut, complained that it was stale, and requested a new one. Wong refused Turner’s request and insisted that Turner had to pay first. Turner would not pay for the stale donut and demanded that Wong give her a new one first. Wong then repeatedly called Turner a racial slur three or four times in front of other white patrons in the store. Wong then told Turner to get out of her store and pointed to the door. After the incident, Turner was “embarrassed, shocked, mortified, hurt, angry and humiliated” but she did not seek medical, therapeutic, or psychiatric treatment. Turner also alleged that she lost her self-esteem. After discovery, Wong moved for summary judgment. The court found that Turner did not prove that she suffered severe emotional distress and dismissed her claim for IIED. Turner appealed the summary judgment dismissal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Parrillo, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership