Turner v. Young

205 F.R.D. 592 (2002)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Turner v. Young

United States District Court for the District of Kansas
205 F.R.D. 592 (2002)

SH

Facts

In compliance with a scheduling order entered by the court, Tammy Turner (plaintiff) and Stanhope Express, Inc. (defendant) scheduled a mediation. Shortly before the mediation was to take place, Stanhope requested permission to have a claims handler with settlement authority participate in the mediation by phone, to which Turner objected. On the day of the mediation, Stanhope was accompanied by Scott Glow, a representative of Stanhope’s liability-insurance carrier. Per the carrier’s instructions, Glow had authority to settle Turner’s claims up to $25,000. After Turner’s counsel communicated that the mediation was being conducted to settle Turner’s personal-injury claims, but not the potential invasion-of-privacy claims Turner had yet to act upon, Glow phoned the carrier and received authorization to settle Turner’s claims up to $20,000 if the settlement did not include a release of her invasion-of-privacy claims. The mediation proceeded, and the parties reached an impasse. Turner filed a motion for sanctions against Stanhope for its failure to send a representative to the mediation who had authority to settle Turner’s claims.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (O’Hara, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership