Ty, Inc. v. GMA Accessories, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
132 F.3d 1167 (1997)

- Written by Cynthia (Anderson) Beeler, JD
Facts
Ty, Incorporated (Ty) (plaintiff) manufactured the Beanie Baby stuffed animals. The line of stuffed animals included a pig named Squealer and a cow named Daisy. GMA Accessories, Incorporated (GMA) (defendant) produced a competing line of small stuffed animals. Included in GMA’s line of stuffed animals were a pig called Preston the Pig and a cow called Louie the Cow. Ty sued GMA under the Copyright Act and obtained a preliminary injunction against GMA’s continued sale of Preston the Pig and Louie the Cow. GMA submitted a picture of Squealer and Preston side by side. The version of Preston pictured was a version that had a manufacturing defect that made it appear less like Squealer than the version normally sold. Additionally, the angle of the picture incorrectly made the stuffed animals appear to be different lengths. Also, the picture showed Preston with a ribbon around its neck, but the ribbon was not included in the retail version. The pictured version of Preston was similar to the design initially submitted to GMA by Janet Salmon, the stuffed animal’s designer, rather than the version ultimately put into production. GMA appealed the injunction as to Preston, but not as to Louie the Cow.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Posner, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.