Ty, Inc. v. Jones Group

237 F.3d 891 (2001)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ty, Inc. v. Jones Group

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
237 F.3d 891 (2001)

RW

Facts

Ty, Inc. (plaintiff) made pellet-filled plush animal toys called Beanie Babies. The Jones Group (Jones) (defendant) made pellet-filled plush race car toys called Beanie Racers. Jones began selling Beanie Racers in full awareness that Beanie Babies were already on the market and that consumers could be confused by the similarity in the two products' names. Ty sued Jones for trademark infringement and moved for a preliminary injunction, prohibiting Jones from marketing Beanie Racers pending the outcome of the suit. The judge ruled that, since both parties used "Beanie" in their product names, there was a more than negligible chance that consumers would be confused by the product similarities, and that Ty would suffer a greater harm if the judge wrongly denied the injunction than Jones would suffer if the judge wrongly granted the injunction. The judge granted Ty's motion but required Ty to post a substantial bond to compensate Jones, should Jones ultimately prevail, for any loss of business caused by the injunction. Jones appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Flaum, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership