Tydings v. Greenfield, Stein & Senior, LLP

11 N.Y.3d 195, 868 N.Y.S.2d 563, 897 N.E.2d 1044 (2008)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Tydings v. Greenfield, Stein & Senior, LLP

New York Court of Appeals
11 N.Y.3d 195, 868 N.Y.S.2d 563, 897 N.E.2d 1044 (2008)

Facts

Frieda Tydings (plaintiff) served as trustee for a trust created by Ricki Singer. More than six years after Tydings resigned her trusteeship, Singer filed a petition in surrogate’s court seeking an accounting from Tydings. Tydings hired the law firm of Greenfield, Stein & Senior, LLP (Greenfield) (defendant) to represent her, but Greenfield never answered Singer’s petition or otherwise asserted a statute-of-limitations defense. The surrogate ordered Tydings to provide an accounting, which Tydings did. When Singer objected to the accounting, Tydings, through new counsel, moved to dismiss the objections as time-barred. The surrogate rejected Tydings’s statute-of-limitations argument on two independent grounds: (1) the statute of limitations did not expire before Singer filed her petition and (2) Tydings waived the statute of limitations by failing to timely assert it. The appellate division affirmed on the basis of waiver without addressing whether the statute of limitations had expired. Tydings then sued Greenfield for failing to assert the statute of limitations. Greenfield responded that Tydings had to show that she had a valid statute-of-limitations defense and that the surrogate court’s rejection of Tydings’s statute-of-limitations defense on the merits collaterally estopped Tydings from relitigating that issue. The supreme court dismissed Tydings’s complaint, but the appellate division reversed. Greenfield appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership